14 Jul 12 at 2 am

Asked by Anonymous

asker Mr. R, you have been quiet for a long time... What are you planning Mr. R?

http://eyenigma.tumblr.com/

 9
18 Apr 12 at 1 am

becdecorbin:

SURPRISE!

Mr. R moved blogs.

old blog is now aratgnak

new blog is eyenigma

I have practical reasons for this. :| been meaning to do this before but eh, lazy lazy.

thislexicalgap:

eyenigma:

THAT’S TOO BAD. WOULD YOU NOT BE MORE PERTURBED IF MY MOTIVATIONS WERE HUMAN?

I can at least understand a human’s motivations, while yours, I doubt I could comprehend.

THE INTERESTING THING ABOUT HUMANS IS THEIR THIRST FOR KNOWLEDGE AND YET THEY FEEL SAFETY IN IGNORANCE.

KNOWING THINGS CAN BE DANGEROUS, BUT NOT KNOWING CAN ALSO PUT ONE IN PERIL.

(Source: aratgnak, via flaming-loser)

thislexicalgap:

eyenigma:

YOU WOULD NOT BE BOTHERING YOURSELF WITH THAT IF I ELIMINATE SAID THOUGHT PATTERN.

I AM CURIOUS THOUGH — WHAT EXACTLY IS NOT COMFORTING ABOUT IT?

I’ve never been fond of the idea that someone is watching me, Mr. R, nor the idea of anyone being intimate with my neuroglia.

THAT’S TOO BAD. WOULD YOU NOT BE MORE PERTURBED IF MY MOTIVATIONS WERE HUMAN?

(Source: aratgnak, via flaming-loser)

 16
05 Apr 12 at 10 am

Asked by nunuru

tags: nunuru  asks 
asker Which animal would you enjoy devouring the most?

thislexicalgap:

IS HE A HUMAN?

THERE ISN’T A HUMAN I’VE ENCOUNTERED WHOSE NEUROGLIA I HAVEN’T BEEN INTIMATELY FAMILIAR WITH.

Well that’s certainly not a comforting thought.

YOU WOULD NOT BE BOTHERING YOURSELF WITH THAT IF I ELIMINATE SAID THOUGHT PATTERN.

I AM CURIOUS THOUGH — WHAT EXACTLY IS NOT COMFORTING ABOUT IT?

(Source: aratgnak, via flaming-loser)

databat:

Stay out of my head :|

CUTE.

(Source: aratgnak, via angry-fish-woman)

IS HE A HUMAN?

THERE ISN’T A HUMAN I’VE ENCOUNTERED WHOSE NEUROGLIA I HAVEN’T BEEN INTIMATELY FAMILIAR WITH.

asker Have you every tried wearing glasses before?

 43
02 Apr 12 at 10 am

Asked by hisroyalmagesty

tags: octopuddle  asks 
asker I want you.

 368
31 Mar 12 at 1 pm

0versite:

“Since a three-dimensional object casts a two-dimensional shadow, we should be able to imagine the unknown four-dimensional object whose shadow we are.  I for my part am fascinated by the search for a one-dimensional object that casts no shadow at all.”

—Marcel Duchamp

(Source: apoetreflects, via doriandawes)

0versite:

“Since a three-dimensional object casts a two-dimensional shadow, we should be able to imagine the unknown four-dimensional object whose shadow we are.  I for my part am fascinated by the search for a one-dimensional object that casts no shadow at all.”
—Marcel Duchamp
 110
25 Mar 12 at 2 am

tags: noise 
(799) plays
 11
25 Mar 12 at 2 am

Asked by quillusquillus

tags: quillusquillus  asks 
asker If you're a perception of our reality, how do YOU perceive reality? Do you think it's the same as we material beings do?

LET ME PUT IT THIS WAY: YOUR REALITY IS A MUFFLED, SENSORY-DEPRIVED VERSION OF THE REALITY I EXPERIENCE.

LET’S THINK ABOUT IT. THIS VIRTUAL REALITY IS A GOOD EXAMPLE OF AN EVEN FURTHER LIMITED REALM, ONLY TWO SENSES AND ONLY TWO DIMENSIONS, COMPARED TO WHAT YOU EXPERIENCE OUTSIDE IT, WHICH IS LIMITED COMPARED TO HOW I PERCEIVE REALITY.

WOULD YOU CALL WHAT GOES BEYOND IT “HYPERREALITY”?